The Prophet's Call

Watchman, What of the Night?

Ps Tan: The Chastening of God

The Chastening of God
Ps Tan

The same Christians who hold the second view claim that sicknesses are part of the chastening of God. In other words, God is teaching us many lessons for our spiritual good. Which earthly father will teach a child by making a child sick? In fact by natural and social laws, any human being, who goes about putting sicknesses on people trying to teach them something, will probably be put in jail. Which earthly father will teach a child the danger of fire by burning their child? No doubt the child will certainly know the danger of fire if they get burnt a few times, but is it a sound method to use in educating the child?

Some claim that being sick has brought them closer to God. Then why aren’t all the sick people in hospitals closer to God? In fact, many have gone further away from God because they thought that it was God who did it to them. How is it that Jesus did not get sick to be close to God? Why then was sickness classified as a curse and not as a blessing? (Deut. 28:15, 58-61).

The word ‘chasten’ is the Greek word ‘paideuo.’ God does chasten us (Heb. 12:6,7, 10; Rev. 3:19). However, the instrument of His chastening is not sicknesses but His Word (Ps. 94:12). Paul said to Timothy that the Word of God was profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction and for instruction or chastening (2 Tim. 3:16 instruct – paideuo). Paul brought correction to the Corinthian church not by praying for them to be sick but by sound teaching from the Word of God through his letters (2 Cor. 7:8-11).

~ ~ ~

“How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!”
… and “to guide our feet in the way of peace.”

Wommack: Politics

1 Timothy 6:2

And they that have believing masters, let them not despise [them], because they are brethren; but rather do [them] service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort.
Note 3 at 1 Tim. 6:2: Paul never used his influence for social change, even in this appalling situation of slavery (see note 6 at 1 Cor. 7:21, p. 894). Some might argue that he couldn’t have changed the practice of slavery so what would have been the use of trying. It’s true that Paul might not have been able to change the whole Roman world, but he certainly had the power to stop, or at least limit slavery among the Christians.

Paul’s passiveness toward slavery and social change would be offensive to many Christians today. It is popular in our day and age to preach social change as an obligation and duty of every Christian. That was not Paul’s approach.

Paul didn’t outlaw slavery but rather told the Christian slaves to honor their masters. In the case where a Christian slave had a Christian master, Paul told him to serve his master all the more because they were brethren. This would infuriate social activists today. They would see that as approval of the situation.

The Bible and Paul didn’t approve of slavery or any other wrong of man toward man, but the true power of Christianity is not mobilizing its members to political action. The power of the Gospel changes the hearts of men, one at a time. If every Christian was an activist in sharing the good news with everyone he came in contact with, then hearts would change. When that happened in enough people, political and social change would follow.

Our preoccupation with our physical situations speaks volumes. Those who crusade for physical justice over spiritual justice and freedom miss the point. Those who are free in spirit are free indeed (Jn. 8:36), regardless of their physical circumstances. Our primary purpose always has been and always should be, to share the good news of our freedom in Christ with others.

Note 4 at 1 Tim. 6:2: The question is asked, “What about slaves that have believing masters?” Since all believers are one in Christ, a slave could reason that his master should no longer treat him as a slave, he should have special treatment. Paul said that instead of getting favors, the slave should serve the master all the better, since the master is a believer and beloved.

We should never use Christianity for our own advantage. As brothers in Christ we should try to out do one another in blessing and courtesy toward our brethren and others. These things we are to teach and exhort one another to do.

Once again, this is a foreign way of thinking to modern Christians because they have a love for self that is usually greater than their love for God and other people. However, Paul is the one who had it right. We should love God first, others second and ourselves last. It’s in losing our lives that we really find life (Mt. 10:39; 16:25). It’s only when we die to our selves that we really live (Jn. 12:25). Wommack

Dowie: Politics

God was guiding His servant, and had he fully learned the lessons that were being taught him during those days, he might have been spared some heartbreaking sorrows that were to come later…. The man of God really has no place in the politics of this world. While reformation in government is sadly needed and to be prayed for and encouraged, yet, the man who has a true calling from God has a higher work to do. His is a calling to a ministry which strikes at a more vital spot in the lives of men—that is, their hearts. Not reformation, which is good as far as it goes, but transformation by the grace of God. Never will politics succeed in regenerating the world. Only the grace of God can do this work, and then only for those who will permit such to take place within their hearts.